U.N.'s plan for world
to the Kafir, not Allah(swt)! Supported by the Puppet
regimes throughout the Muslim world.
The Reality on the Ground!
U.N.'s plan for world government
uploaded 08 Jun 2003
WND probe unearths plot for global taxation, gun control,
and a standing army.
The United Nations and the United States are engaged
in a major battle over American sovereignty –
the last major impediment to global governance –
according to the May edition of WND's acclaimed monthly
Titled "THE NEW
WORLD RE-ORDER," this special edition
lays bare the United Nation's plan for global governance.
The U.N.'s plan, dubbed "Our Global Neighborhood,"
is a 410-page final report of the Commission on Global
Governance, and was first published in 1995 by Oxford
University Press. That 28-member "independent commission,"
created by former German Chancellor Willy Brandt, developed
the following strategy, as reported in the EcoSocialist
Review: "To represent a shot-across-the-bow of
George Bush's New World Order, and make clear that now
is the time to press for the subordination of national
sovereignty to democratic transnationalism."
Then-U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali endorsed
the commission, and the U.N. provided significant funding.
The plan calls for dramatically strengthening the United
Nations, by implementing a laundry list of recommendations,
- Eliminating the veto and permanent member status
in the Security Council;
- Authorizing global taxation on currency exchange
and use of the "global commons;"
- Creating an International Criminal Court;
- Creating a standing army under the command of the
- Creating a new Economic Security Council;
- Creating a new People's Assembly;
- Regulating multinational corporations;
- Regulating the global commons;
- Controlling the manufacture, sale and distribution
of all firearms.
None of the recommendations
in the report is new; all have been proposed in a
variety of documents for decades. This report, however,
is the first time the comprehensive plan for global
governance has been published with the approval and
funding support of the United Nations, according to
To justify the sweeping changes proposed by the commission,
a new concept of "security" was offered. The
U.N.'s mission under its present charter is to provide
"security" to its member nations through "collective"
action. The new concept expands the mission of the U.N.
to be the security of the people – and the security
of the planet.
Thus, in their speeches to the U.N.'s Millennium Assembly
in 2000, both Secretary General Kofi Annan and President
Bill Clinton made reference to this new concept, saying
national sovereignty can no longer be used as an excuse
to prevent the intervention by the U.N. to provide "security"
for people inside national boundaries
To provide security for the planet, the plan calls
for authorizing the U.N. Trusteeship Council to have
"trusteeship" over the "global commons,"
which the plan defines to be: "... the atmosphere,
outer space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction,
and the related environment and life-support systems
that contribute to the support of human life."
land ownership under attack
Actually, the U.N. has been working to achieve this
goal for more than two decades, reports Whistleblower,
but the work has been pursued as a part of the environmental
agenda. A first glimpse of the environmental agenda's
magnitude came in 1992, when the U.N. Conference on
Environment and Development presented for adoption a
300-page policy document called Agenda 21. This document
made clear that the only way to protect the environment
is to control the activities of the people who use it.
Each of the nations that endorsed Agenda 21 agreed
to create a national council to implement its recommendations.
Bill Clinton issued Executive Order 12852 on June 29,
1993, which created the President's Council on Sustainable
Development. This 28-member council included the heads
of the government departments concerned with the environment
and commerce, the heads of major environmental groups,
and four representatives from business, one of whom
was Ken Lay of Enron infamy.
This group worked through the end of 1999 to implement
the recommendations of Agenda 21 throughout the United
States, primarily by rewriting and refocusing the rules
of implementation for existing legislation, and by encouraging
state and local governments to implement the recommendations
at the local level. With the coordinated assistance
of the Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy and the National
Wildlife Federation – all of whose executives
sat on the President's Council on Sustainable Development
– the message of "sustainable development"
and "sustainable communities" spread rapidly
across the country.
Among the many goals of the President's Council was
to change the way public policy is made in the United
States. Its "Belief Statements" include this:
"We need a new collaborative decision process that
leads to better decisions, more rapid change, more sensible
use of human, natural, and financial resources in meeting
The new collaborative decision process is the same
consensus process used by the United Nations. It is
a process that uses trained "facilitators"
to assure a predetermined outcome.
Every department of government has trained facilitators
to transform public-input meetings into "consensus-building"
sessions. With the support of various environmental
groups, virtually every community in the country began
to see "visioning councils" and "stakeholder
councils" appear, to develop plans for a "sustainable
community" for the 21st century.
These plans are remarkably similar, whether in Santa
Cruz, Calif., where they call the process "Local
Agenda 21," or in "Yourtown 2020," they
all end up with the recommendations set forth in Agenda
When examined from a national perspective, the local
plans, arrived at by consensus, are elements of the
broader plan to "provide security for the planet"
by controlling the activities of the people.
To achieve this objective, private property has to
be effectively eliminated. This U.N. policy was first
adopted in 1976 at the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements
in Vancouver, British Columbia. Its final report says:
"Land ... cannot be treated as an ordinary asset,
controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures
and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership
is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration
of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice.
… Public control of land use is therefore indispensable.
Three years later, the U.S. State Department entered
into a Memorandum of Agreement with the United Nations
Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization to
launch a Man and the Biosphere Program, which designated
vast stretches of land as wilderness. The Convention
on Biological Diversity began its life in 1981 and evolved
until 1992, when it was formally adopted by the U.N.
in Rio de Janeiro.
This international law requires the creation of wilderness
areas, all connected by corridors of wilderness and
surrounded by buffer zones, in which human activity
is regulated by the government, while the population
is forced to move into "sustainable communities."
There are more than 400 of these wilderness areas, called
U.N. Biosphere Reserves, throughout the world; 47 are
in the United States, with another proposed for the
Chicago area and yet another proposed for the Bay of
Fundy on the Maine/Canada border.
Remarkable progress has been made toward transforming
the United States into this United Nations vision of
a "secure planet." Because each plan element
operates at the local level, it is difficult to see
the ultimate outcome. A picture of the dream is suggested,
however, in the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development report authored by Andrew Euston
for the U.N. Conference on Human Development meeting
in Istanbul in 1996.
The report describes in considerable detail how "sustainable"
communities of the future will be bounded by growth
limits, surrounded by open space, with housing provided
by public/private partnerships that require both economic
and ethnic integration, and feature live-over shops
and services. Transportation in these communities will
feature light rail and bicycle, since automobiles will
be unnecessary; people are expected to work within walking
distance of their employment. Each complex in the community
is a "neighborhood" that provides schools
and day care, governed by a "neighborhood council."
Agriculture and light "sustainable" industry
will occur in the buffer zones between the communities
and the Biosphere Reserves, under the direction of the
government, in public/private partnerships with non-government
organizations that oversee day-to-day operations.
Policy decisions are to be made by the council closest
to the people governed by the policy, providing that
the policy is consistent with each of the councils in
the hierarchy. The ideal system of governance in this
utopian vision would see the government selecting a
non-government organization, or NGO, for a particular
neighborhood project. The majority of the neighborhood
council would consist of board members of the NGO, with
a few additional representatives selected by the NGO.
The neighborhood council would choose a representative
to sit on the community council, which would choose
a representative to sit on the watershed council, which
would choose a representative to sit on the bioregional
council, which would choose a representative to sit
on the national council, which would choose a representative
to the People's Assembly at the United Nations.
Sound familiar? This system parallels the old Soviet
system in Russia, in both design and function. It has
been under development in the United States since launched
in 1993 by the President's Council on Sustainable Development.
Progress so far has been mostly voluntary – "to
comply with international obligations." But success
will come for the U.N. only when it has the power to
enforce its international law. That's the next step.
The May edition of Whistleblower, perhaps as never
before, lays bare the knock-down, drag-out fight between
backers of American sovereignty and global governance.
"For a long time we have planned a Whistleblower
issue on globalism and the United Nations," said
WND Editor Joseph Farah. "Now is the time. The
next few months may indeed define what kind of country
and world we live in for the rest of our lives. If you
care about America, read this issue."
Source: WHISTLEBLOWER MAGAZINE
Send us an email to confirm your thoughts below,
do you agree with this article?: